Showing posts with label Mitt Romney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mitt Romney. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

An American Psychopath Wins South Carolina’s Republican Primary in 2012

As the illusion of choice continues to elude a gullible voter base of misogynistic hick Repugnicans in South Carolina, we see that such voting apart from reason had been predictably cast into the political sewer of contrarian vanity (recall “anything but Romney”). On the surface, it is evident that any vote for a badly aging white morbidly obese man like Gingrich is nothing more than a vote for a much younger, smarter, and physically fit President Obama in 2012. In light of this, I am sure that Obama’s campaign members are delighted by South Carolina’s outcome and will further attempt to damage the prospects of Mitt Romney as their primary concern. Gingrich will simply beat himself along the race especially with comments like “food stamp president” that might work for Repugnican racists in South Carolina, but for a thinking populace (i.e., people that can read); this will only provide ammunition for the incumbent.

Spiritually, this marks South Carolina as a true place of back-woods darkness in which psychopathy is blindly accepted by a majority of Repugnicans as the norm.

Why do I say this?

The former disgraced Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is by definition a psychopath.

Unlike most sociopaths, psychopaths are well organized, seek positions of power over others, and often appear normal unto the unsuspecting eye. As with the disloyal sociopath, they feel no empathy, remorse, or responsibility for the pain, pleasure, and/ or suffering of others. In the case of Gingrich’s ex-wife whom he left for dead once she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, we see a similar pattern of behavior concerning an earlier wife whom he also left with a diagnosis of uterine cancer! During her time immediately following cancer treatment, Gingrich cold heartedly took advantage by requesting further legal matters concerning the details of a previous divorce. He did not, as some accounts falsely report, move to divorce the cancer stricken woman on her death bed. Now ask yourself, what self-respecting woman of any era would vote for this man?

According to the Hare PCL-R list for which Psychopathy can be recognized, we see of Gingrich a menacing superficial charm coupled with the most grandiose sense of self-worth, proneness to boredom, and a serious lack of realistic long term goals such as being elected President of the United States. Cunningly, he is capable of manipulating an audience and like most politicians, openly accepts the parasitic lifestyle.

A pathological liar is a person who projects a belief in one’s own lie often as a misunderstood “truth.” Recently when asked of his censure by Congress for ethics violations (i.e., for lying to Congress), Gingrich responded defensively saying that he had been exonerated of all charges. Exonerated by whom? How many times have we heard the former Speaker of the House belittle his audience by elaborately explaining various “misunderstandings”? In spite of what he thinks, the relevance of his past behavior does matter when running for President of the United States. Perhaps one of the more important signs of psychopathy will include the avoidance of responsibility and in the case of Gingrich, he often cites “divine grace and forgiveness” by his God as a recent convert to Catholicism. This is one of the reasons that psychopaths are often drawn to slave religions such as Christianity; not only can they hide from society within the church, but they can also discharge any and all responsibility for “sin.”

“I am at peace with myself and God”

-Jeffery Dahmer


The Endorsement of a Psychopath

Just before the South Carolina Primary began, Chuck Norris openly endorsed Gingrich. Are you kidding me? This is almost as bad as being endorsed by Sarah Palin. What a poor and insensitive joke this has all become for the Republican party.

Like cat and dog people, there are always comparisons that can be easily made but with Chuck Norris, you either have people like me that are inherently repulsed by him or others who never shit right in public toilets. Such people are rarely seen but you can always know where they have been. Just like in South Carolina, we all know that horrible feeling when kicking open a public stall either to vote or to shit. What is the difference anyway?

In conclusion, I predict that the serious candidate Mitt Romney will aggressively pursue a more reasonable voter base in Florida. This should effectively begin the process of uniting the party behind a viable candidate against the incumbent. Furthermore, this should help to rid this political season of the most comically inept group of candidates in history.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

2011 Q&A for A.C.H.

2011 Q&A for A.C.H.

If you must, please submit your comments and/ or inquiry to my http://www.facebook.com/aaron.c.hanson page and I will do my very best to read each, enjoy the non-sense, and answer a few relevant questions accordingly.

Mexico’s Violence

Q: In the last 5 years since Calderon was elected President of Mexico, the official number of people killed as a direct result of the war on drugs is now reported to be just over 42,000 although some reports indicate a higher number of 91,000 due to the addition of indirect incidences. Combined with the immigration issues, a faltering world economy, and increased drug related violence, what do you see as the best future for Mexico?

A: I must point out that a peculiar relationship has recently emerged between certain powerful enforcement agencies of Mexico and the United States. What I mean to say is that by the mere blind acceptance of an unsuspecting populace, hard-line prohibitionist ideas are being promoted through mass media and worse, a massive industrial prison system for potential profit is now being suggested as a potential solution!

Here in the United States the “war on drugs” has long failed to halt the illicit and destructive use of drugs and has contributed to a massive industrial prison complex housing hundreds of thousands of non-violent drug offenders.

It has been speculated that larger prison complexes with supporting international enforcement agencies could ultimately replace the need for some of today’s unprofitable military operations.

Mexico I believe is under siege not by the so called gangs of violence and drug cartels, but of the idea that enforcement, imprisonment, and hard-line prohibition can work. This we know is not currently working for Mexico nor will it work to serve the unsuspecting public in any time within the future.

Here is the Remote Viewed Optimum Trajectory for Mexico concerning its current problem of drug related violence:

1. Legalize ALL drugs and related activity throughout all of Mexico.

2. Fund public health clinics for any and all forms of dependency and rehabilitation.

3. Build, promote, and support education rather than prisons.

4. Begin the process of replacing physical currency from use within Mexico’s border. For example, retinal scanners, cards, and implanted microchips can be used to track identification and facilitate transactions thereby eliminating overt forms of currency related crime.

5. Permanently open the border of Mexico for free and friendly passage into the United States. Fencing off the border will only create further resentment, violence, and indifference. The crossings will happen anyway, fence or no fence.

Following these recommendations, Mexico’s rate of violent crime will all but cease to exist with the added measure of security for the government of Mexico through the regulation, maintenance, and medically supervised distribution of habit forming drugs.

The industry of hemp alone could account for a highly profitable venture benefiting the good people of Mexico.

Should Mexico continue upon its current path of anti-drug related ignorance and related mass hysteria, there will be no solution found to its current state of suffering, misery, manipulation for profit, and drug related deaths. Easily, all of Mexico can become a safe, profitable, and wondrous place in which to work, visit, study, and live.

Mexico could also rewrite its constitution and declare a tax-free state of guaranteed individual freedoms now lost to Europe and the United States causing an instant influx of wealthy, intelligent, and eccentric individuals willing to expatriate and/ or invest for this purpose alone. The cultural, educational, and technological influence of such an exodus would quickly enhance Mexico’s stability, adaptation, and development in which to compete.


The American Presidential Election of 2012 (Possible Voter “Blacklash“)

Q: Aaron, you publicly stated back during the inauguration of President Obama in 2008 that he would not be re-elected for a second term following what you referred to as a great disappointment. Now I see that your prediction was very accurate. You have also said that this disappointment is unusual. What do you mean by this and what kind of person do you think could be elected to take his place?

A: Such as it now occurs, the pendulum of opportunity swings toward the former Governor Mitt Romney, a most predictable and disarming orator with the right jib for the job. Apart from his public health-care views, there seems to be no real discussion of his personal belief system.

Mitt Romney is a Mormon and why does this matter when facing the ethnicity of today’s incumbent?

Peripherally, it matters least but when thinking about the ultimate strategy of gaining from an unceasing level of public disappointment, race clearly becomes the underlying issue. Strategists know that a majority will not be fully aware of why Romney fits best within the potential reactionary scenario of a 2012 election. Like it or not, the history of racial divisiveness within the early Mormon Church calls upon an alternative to overt forms of hatred and in this way, it will likely be considered safe ground as the unexamined means for a public venting. Justly, today’s Mormon Church does not profess such divisions, hatred, nor other forms racial exclusion. However, its history gives Romney an advantage especially when left unchecked by an unsuspecting voter base.

Knowing this, I find the complementary relationship between Mitt Romney and Utah’s Jon Huntsman very interesting. A doubled presence like this was designed to help ease the burden of a focused element of religion on stage. This was brilliantly done.


The World Economy

Q: When will the economy recover?

A: At best, the world economy will remain recalcitrant for years. At worst, there will be a depression and possibly war. My advice is to avoid being overly prepared. Rather, learn to adapt quickly as one must now expect the unexpected in terms of the extreme. From chaos alone [X] will emerge.